• Fayet, A.L., Shoji, A., Freeman, R., Perrins, C.M. & Guilford, T. (2017) "Within-pair similarity in migration route and female winter foraging effort predict pair-breeding performance in a monogamous seabird" Mar Ecol Prog Ser 569:243-253
  • Fayet, A.L., Freeman, R., Shoji, A., Boyle, D., Kirk, H.L. Dean, B.J., Perrins, C.M. & Guilford, T. (2016) "Drivers and fitness consequences of dispersive migration in a pelagic seabird" Behav. Ecol. ():
  • Burke, C.M. & Montevecchi, W.A. (2009) "The foraging decisions of a central place foraging seabird in response to fluctuations in local prey conditions" Journal of Zoology 278(4): 354-361


  • Wikipedia - Fitness (often denoted w in population genetics models) is a central idea in evolutionary and sexual selection theories. It can be defined either with respect to a genotype or to a phenotype in a given environment. In either case, it describes individual reproductive success and is equal to the average contribution to the gene pool of the next generation that is made by an average individual of the specified genotype or phenotype. The term "Darwinian fitness" can be used to make clear the distinction with physical fitness. Where fitness is affected by differences between various alleles of a given gene, the relative frequency of those alleles will change across generations by natural selection and alleles with greater positive effect on individual fitness will become more common over time; this process is known as natural selection. Fitness does not include a measure of survival or life-span; the well known phrase Survival of the fittest should be interpreted as: "Survival of the form (phenotypic or genotypic) that will leave the most copies of itself in successive generations."